David Cocks Q C demanded of his pupil she kill his unborn child.Herod in his raging and for all his evil did not demand the death of his own child The son who David Cocks QC refused to acknowledge and without conscience or intelligence of a humane father told Sir Derek I couldn't care less if he dies when his baby son was on a life support machine in agony with every struggling breath
David Cocks Q C demanded of his pupil she kill his unborn child.Herod in his raging and for all his evil did not demand the death of his own child The son who David Cocks QC refused to acknowledge and without conscience or intelligence of a humane father told Sir Derek I couldn't care less if he dies when his baby son was on a life support machine in agony with every struggling breath
David Cocks Q C demanded of his pupil she kill his unborn child.Herod in his raging and for all his evil did not demand the death of his own child The son who David Cocks QC refused to acknowledge and without conscience or intelligence of a humane father told Sir Derek I couldn't care less if he dies when his baby son was on a life support machine in agony with every struggling breath
Robert Graves with the child David Cocks abandoned with heartless malice
Hero Sir Derek Spencer Q C who with Nicholas Wilson Q C rescued David Cocks' child from the immense cruelty and disdain inhumanity and abandonment of his cruel father
Great man Sir Derek Spencer
ReplyDeleteI saw this " From Private Eye.
ReplyDelete"Hallo !
Brilliant Barrister David Cocks Q , hero of the Roger Levitt fraud trial in which he led for the crown, has been in court again-on his own behalf. Sadly for David whose many admirers hope will soon don a judges robes, the decision went the wrong way.
He was in court over the long standing matter of maintenance for his lovechild, born to his former pupil barrister, Felicity. The original order for maintenance was for £25,from which he decided to deduct tax ,leaving the child with £16.24p a week. After more than a decade the mother applied to increase the maintenance, At Marylebone Magistrates court she applied to have the order increased and for it to extend until the end of the boy’s fulltime education.
Mr Cocks opposed this and appealed to the higher court. Joanna Dobson QC ,submitted that “The father has used his advantageous financial position to engage in litigation which is wholly misguided, which may have had as its purpose the intimidation of the mother.” The High Court Judge hearing the appeal decided to award indemnity costs-the highest level possible-against poor old David!
luckily he is not in the same league as those errant fathers who are pursued by the child support agency. David owns a £500,000 house in North London, a £3000 race horse, and still has a few coppers left over to take part in some modest pheasant-shooting and stag and fox hunting.
Things worked out well for the father able to leave both the mothers of his children and run off with his best friends wife
well met by moonlight oh Horatio